Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:33:21 +1000 | From | Paul Mackerras <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/26] Dynamic kernel command-line |
| |
Alon Bar-Lev writes:
> Current implementation stores a static command-line > buffer allocated to COMMAND_LINE_SIZE size. Most > architectures stores two copies of this buffer, one > for future reference and one for parameter parsing.
Under what circumstances do we actually need a command line of more than 256 bytes?
It seems to me that if 256 bytes isn't enough, we should take a deep breath, step back, and think about whether there might be a better way to pass whatever information it is that's using up so much of the command line.
Paul.
-- VGER BF report: H 0 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |