lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: oom kill oddness.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 04:03:14PM -0400, Larry Woodman wrote:

> Dave, this has been a problem since the out_of_memory() function was
> changed
> between 2.6.10 and 2.6.11. Before this change out_of_memory() required
> multiple
> calls within 5 seconds before actually OOM killed a process. After the
> change(in 2.6.11)
> a single call to out_of_memory() results in OOM killing a process. The
> following patch
> allows the 2.6.18 system to run under much more memory pressure before
> it OOM kills.

Some of these tests do seem to be readded in Linus' current tree.

[PATCH] oom: don't kill current when another OOM in progress

went in earlier today for eg.
I'm curious why these checks were ever removed in the first place though.

Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-29 23:37    [W:0.035 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site