![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andrew Morton wrote: >> You're ignoring the API issue at hand. Let me say it again for the >> cheap seats: "search" You search a list, and stick a pointer somewhere >> when found. No hardware touched. No allocations. Real world. There >> is an example of usage in the kernel today. > > If it's called in that fashion then the caller should still check the > device_for_each_child() return value to find out if it actually got a > match. Or in the case of scsi_sysfs.c, it simply <does something>. Oh well, whatever. This thing introduces endless build noise we won't kill for years, making it much harder to spot much more serious stuff. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-09-28 04:45 [W:0.240 / U:0.220 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||