[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: GPLv3 Position Statement
    Jan Engelhardt <> writes:

    > Hah then read LICENSE.LGPL!
    > """Most GNU software, including some libraries, is covered by the
    > ordinary GNU General Public License. This license, the GNU Lesser
    > General Public License, applies to certain designated libraries, and
    > is quite different from the ordinary General Public License. We use
    > this license for certain libraries in order to permit linking those
    > libraries into non-free programs."""
    > If the GPL does not mention linking at all, and therefore does not
    > really forbid it, why do we need an LGPL to allow linking then?

    Clarification, just as the system call clarification in the Linux
    kernel COPYING file. By explicitly allowing dynamic linking the LGPL
    makes it clear that it is ok and avoids a lot of legal uncertainty.
    It may be that the that linking doesn't legally create a derived work,
    and that a bunch of the claims in the GPL are invalid, but to find out
    somebody has to bring it to court, get a judgement (not a settlement),
    and appeal it all the way to the supreme court. And to be really sure
    they'd have to do it in just about every country too.


    "Just how much can I get away with and still go to heaven?"

    Christer Weinigel <>
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-28 15:53    [W:0.020 / U:5.588 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site