![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> writes: > On Wednesday 27 September 2006 21:54, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> The following patch set should be enough to clear up the >> outstanding issues with genirq on i386 and x86_64. This actually >> takes things a step farther and moves all of architecture >> dependencies I could find into the appropriate architecture. >> >> So hopefully we are finally close enough that other architectures >> will be able implement msi support, without too much trouble. >> >> msi: Simplify msi sanity checks by adding with generic irq code. >> msi: Only use a single irq_chip for msi interrupts >> msi: Refactor and move the msi irq_chip into the arch code. >> msi: Move the ia64 code into arch/ia64 >> htirq: Tidy up the htirq code > > > The (small) x86-64 parts are fine by me. Thanks. Note this should allow the hack in -mm that disables stack switch with 4K stacks on i386 to be dropped. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-09-28 04:07 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||