![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread Patch in this message |
... or we'll end up with cpu_online_map being evaluated on UP.
In modules. cpumask.h is very careful to avoid that, and for a
very good reason. So should we...
PS: yes, it really triggers (on alpha).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
include/linux/percpu.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
index 3835a96..46ec72f 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu.h
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static inline int __percpu_populate_mask
return 0;
}
-static inline void *__percpu_alloc_mask(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, cpumask_t *mask)
+static __always_inline void *__percpu_alloc_mask(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, cpumask_t *mask)
{
return kzalloc(size, gfp);
}
--
1.4.2.GIT
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-09-27 08:39 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||