lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 27 Sep 2006 07:55:41 +0200 (MEST)
FromJan Engelhardt <>
SubjectRe: GPLv3 Position Statement
>Fuzzy (but realistic) logic:
>
>   kernel != operating_system
>
>   operating_system > kernel
>
>   operating_system - kernel = 0
>
>   kernel - (operating_system - kernel) < 0
>
>Another (license compatibility) Q. is:
>    If the (operating_system - kernel) is re-licensed under v.3 and
>    the kernel is still under v.2 , would it be possible to distribute
>    combination (kernel + (operating_system - kernel)) ?

If by operating system you mean the surrounding userland application, 
then yes, why should there be a problem with a GPL2 kernel and a GPL3 
userland? After all, the userland is not only GPL, but also BSD and 
other stuff.

>The last Q. is how good is the almost forgotten Hurd kernel?

Wild guess: At most on par with Minix.



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-27 03:59    [W:1.134 / U:0.850 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans