lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 25 Sep 2006 15:46:37 -0400
FromJeff Garzik <>
SubjectRe: GPLv3 Position Statement
Neil Brown wrote:
> But maybe I am just misinformed.  Maybe there are dozens of different
> manufacturers making devices that use DRM to prohibit freedom despite
> using GPL code, and maybe there are hundreds of submarine patents
> owned by distributors of GPL code and embodied in that code that the
> owners are going to start suing us overs.... Is there a list of these
> somewhere?

At least for patents, lawyers scream bloody murder if a list of patents 
is posted.  Once that is done, people can no longer claim ignorance of a 
patent.


>> What is the stance of the developer team / kernel maintainers on DRM,
> 
> While I cannot speak for other developers (and sometimes have trouble
> speaking for myself), one stance I have often heard is that DRM is
> simply a tool - one that is largely based on cryptography which is
> just another tool.  They can have good uses and bad uses just like the
> TCP/IP stack (think 'spam').  So code to implement then would (if of
> suitable quality) be allowed into the kernel.  If you want to make DRM
> illegal, speak to your member-of-parliament, not your code developers.

This is a KEY POINT: There can be good DRM as well as bad DRM.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-25 19:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2008