Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:47:40 +0200 | | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 18/28] kbuild: fail kernel compilation in case of unresolved module symbols |
| |
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:36:43PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 12:35:34AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On what architectures do you see lots of these warnings - maybe fixable? > > Otherwise I could do something like this: > > Try allmodconfig someday...
My cross-compile setup severely broke due to me changing dev-machine. Will restore it when I get my hand on a proper dev machine again - current box consumes too much power for normal use (almost 300W) and is not much quicker than my older amd64 box :-(
> > aviro@icy:/usr/src/cross-kernel/volatile/work$ grep -l WARNING.*undefined ../logs/*/X4c > ../logs/alpha-SMP/X4c > ../logs/alpha/X4c > ../logs/arm/X4c > ../logs/armv/X4c > ../logs/chestnut/X4c > ../logs/frv/X4c > ../logs/ia64/X4c > ../logs/m32r/X4c > ../logs/m68k/X4c > ../logs/ppc/X4c > ../logs/ppc44x/X4c > ../logs/ppc64/X4c > ../logs/s390/X4c > ../logs/s390x/X4c > ../logs/sparc32/X4c > ../logs/sparc64/X4c > ../logs/sun3/X4c > ../logs/sun4/X4c > ../logs/uml-i386/X4c > > That's out of 25 targets. The only variants that do _NOT_ trigger are > amd64, amd64-UP, i386 and uml-amd64.
How many of these ougth to be fixed then? > > I more or less agree with rationale behind making that default, but I'd > very much appreciate a way to override that. For now I've just made the > -w line unconditional, but the fewer infrastructure patches I've to carry... OK. Will include it in next round of kbuild updates.
Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |