lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans
    On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:29:21PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    >
    > NOTE: Your mailer generates bogus Mail-Followup-To headers, and you
    > snipped rmk from the To/CC.

    Hmm, curious. I'll file a bug.

    > > Has Andrew commented on why this is proving to be more of a problem?
    > > I've done regular rebases of cpufreq/agpgart (admittedly, they don't
    > > reject hardly ever unless Len has ACPI bits touching cpufreq) without
    > > causing too much headache.
    >
    > Rebasing _inevitably_ causes more headaches than a simple tree update,
    > for any downstream consumer of your tree(s). It is best to avoid wanton
    > rebasing.

    Sorry, terminology confusion. I rarely throw away a tree and start afresh,
    I meant of course just updating to linus' latest. This may explain the
    my lack of understanding over Russell's issues.

    Dave
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-22 19:13    [W:3.310 / U:1.292 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site