lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Smaller compressed kernel source tarballs?
From
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:43:46PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 7zip (LZMA) decompresses quickly, and the decompressor text is actually
> smaller than the equivalent for gzip. Quite nice.
>
> What is not nice is the code for the compressor, which is a total mess.
> I have been holding out on implementing LZMA on kernel.org, because
> just as zip (deflate) didn't become common in the Unix world until an
> encapsulation format that handles things expected in the Unix world,
> e.g. streaming, was created (gzip), I don't think LZMA is going to be
> widely used until there is an "lzip" which does the same thing. I
> actually started the work of adding LZMA support to gzip, but then
> realized it would be better if a new encapsulation format with proper
> 64-bit support everywhere was created.

It doesn't handle streaming?

So you can't do: tar c dirname | 7zip dirname.tar.7z ?

--
Len Sorensen
RuggedCom
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-22 16:03    [W:0.337 / U:3.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site