![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andrew Morton wrote: > A wander through the -mm patch queue, along with some commentary on my > intentions. > > > When replying to this email, please rewrite the Subject: to something > appropriate. Please also attempt to cc the appropriate developer(s). > > > There are quite a lot of patches here which belong in subsystem trees. > I'll patchbomb the relevant maintainers soon. Could I pleeeeeze ask that > they either merge the patches or solidly nack them (with reasons)? Don't > just ignore it all and leave me hanging onto this stuff for ever. Thanks. I know this is probably heresy, but what would happen if we didn't merge all that stuff at once, and then committed to having a real 4-week cycle? The cycles seem to be stretching out again, and I don't really think it's worth it to hold up the entire kernel for every single piddly little regression to get fixed. We'll _never_ be perfect, even if we weren't slackers. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-09-21 04:25 [W:1.298 / U:0.170 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||