lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] move put_task_struct() reaping into a thread [Re: 2.6.18-rt1]
From
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:16:24AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote:
> > It's correct from the standpoint of it being reaped in another thread,
> > so it fixed those crashes. But I pushed it down into another thread at
> > the request of Esben and his private discussion with Paul McKenney,
> > since a summary from Esben felt that call_rcu() was somehow less than
> > ideal to do that.
>
> but it _is_ already being reaped in another thread: softirq-rcu.
> Splitting that up any further will only fragment the context-switching
> and increases cache footprint - it wont (or rather, shouldnt) have any
> functional effect. (As a sidenote, i'm considering the unification of
> all 'same default priority' softirq threads into a single thread per
> CPU, to further reduce this cost of 'spreadout'.)

I overloaded another reaping thread that was doing largely similar
functionality in that it was also reaping, so I don't think it's that bad.
I did it from a cleanliness point of view with the code tree. It's the
"desched_thread" in fork.c that I'm using. It seems to be the right
thing to do. I'm sure Esben will follow up on this.

> > > that you saw crashes under 2.6.17 - but did you manage to figure out
> > > what the reason is for those crashes, and do those reasons really
> > > necessiate the pushing of task-reapdown into yet another set of
> > > kernel threads?
> >
> > Unfortunately no. I even used Robert's .config on my machine. I added
> > a disk controller and networking device driver just to boot into his
> > configuration and I still couldn't replicated any of his kjournald
> > problems at all. If I had his hardware I'd have a better way of
> > replicating those problems and pound it out.
>
> ok, then i guess what we have left is to wait and see whether it still
> triggers with the current 2.6.18-rt codebase - maybe it triggers for
> someone in a scenario that is easier to debug.

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-21 09:35    [W:0.432 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site