lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)

* Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org> wrote:

> +config MARK_SYMBOL
> +config MARK_JUMP_CALL
> +config MARK_JUMP_INLINE
> +config MARK_JUMP

same NACK over the proliferation of options as before:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115881457219562&w=2

Tap, tap, is this thing on? ;)

found one related reply from you that i didnt answer yet:

"As an example, LTTng traces the page fault handler, when kprobes just
can't instrument it."

but tracing a raw pagefault at the arch level is a bad idea anyway, we
want to trace __handle_mm_fault(). That way you can avoid having to
modify every architecture's pagefault handler ...

but the other points remained unanswered as far as i can see.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-21 18:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site