lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)

    * Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org> wrote:

    > +config MARK_SYMBOL
    > +config MARK_JUMP_CALL
    > +config MARK_JUMP_INLINE
    > +config MARK_JUMP

    same NACK over the proliferation of options as before:

    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115881457219562&w=2

    Tap, tap, is this thing on? ;)

    found one related reply from you that i didnt answer yet:

    "As an example, LTTng traces the page fault handler, when kprobes just
    can't instrument it."

    but tracing a raw pagefault at the arch level is a bad idea anyway, we
    want to trace __handle_mm_fault(). That way you can avoid having to
    modify every architecture's pagefault handler ...

    but the other points remained unanswered as far as i can see.

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-21 18:21    [from the cache]
    ©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean