![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:28:51 -0700 john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 13:54 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > A wander through the -mm patch queue, along with some commentary on my > > intentions.> > > > When replying to this email, please rewrite the Subject: to something > > appropriate. Please also attempt to cc the appropriate developer(s). > >> > ntp-move-all-the-ntp-related-code-to-ntpc.patch> > ntp-move-all-the-ntp-related-code-to-ntpc-fix.patch > > ntp-add-ntp_update_frequency.patch> > ntp-add-ntp_update_frequency-fix.patch> > ntp-add-time_adj-to-tick-length.patch> > ntp-add-time_freq-to-tick-length.patch> > ntp-prescale-time_offset.patch> > ntp-add-time_adjust-to-tick-length.patch> > ntp-remove-time_tolerance.patch> > ntp-convert-time_freq-to-nsec-value.patch> > ntp-convert-to-the-ntp4-reference-model.patch> > ntp-cleanup-defines-and-comments.patch> > kernel-time-ntpc-possible-cleanups.patch> > kill-wall_jiffies.patch> >> > Will merge.> > No objections here, but I wanted to put forth some caution as I've seen > some odd NTP behavior with the full NTP patchset on my laptop (either it > does not converge or it just converges *much* more slowly then without). > Unfortunately I've not been able to collect solid enough data to analyze > the issue (really, each run should go for atleast a full day and always > run on the same network).> > However, in trying to narrow it down, the> ntp-add-time_adj-to-tick-length patch is where the behavior seems to > change the most. Again, no solid data, so I could be seeing ghosts, but > I wanted to mention it.> > I'll try to put aside some time to run a few longer tests and see if I > can get some clear results.> OK, thanks. Won't merge. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-09-21 04:45 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||