lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 20 Sep 2006 17:09:57 -0700
From"Martin J. Bligh" <>
SubjectRe: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans
> introduce-config_zone_dma.patch
> optional-zone_dma-in-the-vm.patch
> optional-zone_dma-in-the-vm-tidy.patch
> optional-zone_dma-for-i386.patch
> optional-zone_dma-for-x86_64.patch
> optional-zone_dma-for-ia64.patch
> remove-zone_dma-remains-from-parisc.patch
> remove-zone_dma-remains-from-sh-sh64.patch

Would it not make sense to define what ZONE_DMA actually means
consistently before trying to change it? The current mess across
different architectures seems like a disaster area to me.
What DOES requesting ZONE_DMA from a driver actually mean?

M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-21 02:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2008