lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
From
Date
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:36 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Rohit Seth wrote:
>
> > > How does the containers implementation under discussion behave if a
> > > process is part of a container and the container is removed?
> > It first removes all the tasks belonging to this container (which means
> > resetting the container pointers in task_struct and then per page
> > container pointer belonging to anonymous pages). It then clears the
> > container pointers in the mapping structure and also in the pages
> > belonging to these files.
>
> So the application continues to run unharmed?
>

It will hit a one time penalty of getting those pointers reset, but
besides that it will continue to run fine.

> Could we equip containers with restrictions on processors and nodes for
> NUMA?
>

Yes. That is something we will have to do (I think part of CPU
handler-TBD).

-rohit

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-21 01:43    [W:0.184 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site