Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction | From | Rohit Seth <> | Date | Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:39:29 -0700 |
| |
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:36 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Rohit Seth wrote: > > > > How does the containers implementation under discussion behave if a > > > process is part of a container and the container is removed? > > It first removes all the tasks belonging to this container (which means > > resetting the container pointers in task_struct and then per page > > container pointer belonging to anonymous pages). It then clears the > > container pointers in the mapping structure and also in the pages > > belonging to these files. > > So the application continues to run unharmed? >
It will hit a one time penalty of getting those pointers reset, but besides that it will continue to run fine.
> Could we equip containers with restrictions on processors and nodes for > NUMA? >
Yes. That is something we will have to do (I think part of CPU handler-TBD).
-rohit
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |