Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction | From | Rohit Seth <> | Date | Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:38:08 -0700 |
| |
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 20:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Yes, I read that in your patches, I was wondering how the cpuset > approach would handle this. > > Neither are really satisfactory for shared mappings. >
In which way? We could have the per container flag indicating whether to charge this container for shared mapping that it initiates or to the container where mapping belongs...or is there something different that you are referring.
-rohit
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |