lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 2 Sep 2006 09:16:56 +0200 (MEST)
FromJan Engelhardt <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/16] GFS2: bmap and inode functions
>> >+	for (i = ip->i_di.di_height; i--;)
>> >+		mp->mp_list[i] = (__u16)do_div(b, sdp->sd_inptrs);
>> 
>> Drop the cast if possible. do_div returns an integer.
>
>hm, do we need an explicit do_div() in fact, why not just "b / inptrs"?

b is int64 so if we just did b/inptrs, gcc would likely generate calls for 
__udivdi3. Is this udivdi3 dependency satisfied in other code (lib/...?)?

>> How about inverting the if() to:
>> 
>> 	if(ip == NULL)
>> 		return;
>> 	if(test_bit(GLF_DIRTY, &gl->gl_flags))
>> 		gfs_inode_attr_in(ip);
>> 	gfs2_meta_cache_flush(ip);
>
>btw., it should be "if (", not "if(".

There is no such rule in CodingStyle.



Jan Engelhardt
-- 

-- 
VGER BF report: H 0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-02 07:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2008