![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Martin Bligh (mbligh@google.com) wrote: > How about we combine all three ideas together ... > > 1. Load modified copy of the function in question. > 2. overwrite the first instruction of the routine with an int3 that > does what you say (atomically) > 3. Then overwrite the second instruction with a jump that's faster > 4. Now atomically overwrite the int3 with a nop, and let the jump > take over. > Very good idea.. However, overwriting the second instruction with a jump could be dangerous on preemptible and SMP kernels, because we never know if a thread has an IP in any of its contexts that would return exactly at the middle of the jump. I think it would be doable to overwrite a 5+ bytes instruction with a NOP non-atomically in all cases, but as the instructions nin the prologue seems to be smaller : prologue on x86 0: 55 push %ebp 1: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp epilogue on x86 3: 5d pop %ebp 4: c3 ret Then is can be a problem. Ideas are welcome. Mathieu OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-09-19 15:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||