lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 18 Sep 2006 10:21:01 +0200
FromJes Sorensen <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:>> The bottom line is :>>>> LTTng impact on the studied phenomenon : 35% slower
>>>> LTTng+kprobes impact on the studied phenomenon : 73% slower
>>>> Therefore, I conclude that on this type of high event rate workload, kprobes
>> doubles the tracer impact on the system.> > Amen to that. Hopefully this puts to rest the myth of Mr. Scrub.

If it wasn't because it's so sad, this would be hysterically funny.

Jes


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-18 10:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2008