![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Karim Yaghmour wrote: > Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> The bottom line is : >> >> LTTng impact on the studied phenomenon : 35% slower >> >> LTTng+kprobes impact on the studied phenomenon : 73% slower >> >> Therefore, I conclude that on this type of high event rate workload, kprobes >> doubles the tracer impact on the system. > > Amen to that. Hopefully this puts to rest the myth of Mr. Scrub. If it wasn't because it's so sad, this would be hysterically funny. Jes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-09-18 08:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||