lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
Hi,

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > > [...] I think Ingo said that some "static tracepoints" (eg.
> > > annotation) could be acceptable.
> >
> > No, he made it rather clear, that as far as possible he only wants
> > dynamic annotations (e.g. via function attributes).
>
> what you say is totally and utterly nonsensical misrepresentation of
> what i have said. I always said: i support in-source annotations too (I
> even suggested APIs how to do them),

Some consistency would certainly help:
'my suggested API is not "barely usable" for static tracers but "totally
unusable".'

<20060916082214.GD6317@elte.hu>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-17 22:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site