Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:25:27 +0200 | | From | Ingo Molnar <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 |
| |
* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Ingo, you happily still ignore my primary issues, how serious do you > expect me to take this?
I did not ignore your new "primary issues", to the contrary. Please read my replies. To recap, your "primary issues" are:
> The foremost issue is still that there is only limited kprobes > support.
> The main issue in supporting static tracers are the tracepoints and so > far I haven't seen any convincing proof that the maintainance overhead > of dynamic and static tracepoints has to be significantly different.
to both points i (and others) already replied in great detail - please follow up on them. (I can quote message-IDs if you cannot find them.)
[ Or if it's not these two then let me know if i missed some important point - it's easy to miss a valid point in a sea of of replies. For example yesterday i have replied to 7 different issues _you_ raised, partly issues where you have questioned my credibility and competence, so i felt compelled to reply - but still you replied to none of those mails, only declaring them "secondary" in a passing reference. If they were secondary then why did you raise them in the first place? Or do you summarily concede all those points by not replying to them? And is there any guarantee that you will reply to any mails i write to you now? Will you declare them "secondary" too once the argument appears to turn unfavorable to your position? ]
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |