[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

    * Roman Zippel <> wrote:

    > Ingo, you happily still ignore my primary issues, how serious do you
    > expect me to take this?

    I did not ignore your new "primary issues", to the contrary. Please read
    my replies. To recap, your "primary issues" are:

    > The foremost issue is still that there is only limited kprobes
    > support.

    > The main issue in supporting static tracers are the tracepoints and so
    > far I haven't seen any convincing proof that the maintainance overhead
    > of dynamic and static tracepoints has to be significantly different.

    to both points i (and others) already replied in great detail - please
    follow up on them. (I can quote message-IDs if you cannot find them.)

    [ Or if it's not these two then let me know if i missed some important
    point - it's easy to miss a valid point in a sea of of replies.
    For example yesterday i have replied to 7 different issues _you_
    raised, partly issues where you have questioned my credibility and
    competence, so i felt compelled to reply - but still you replied to
    none of those mails, only declaring them "secondary" in a passing
    reference. If they were secondary then why did you raise them in the
    first place? Or do you summarily concede all those points by not
    replying to them? And is there any guarantee that you will reply to
    any mails i write to you now? Will you declare them "secondary" too
    once the argument appears to turn unfavorable to your position? ]


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-17 17:39    [W:0.022 / U:55.652 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site