lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> oh, really? Karim's characterization was:
>
> " I'm factually explaining the real-life result of resistance to static
> instrumentation. "
>
> so whose interpretation of Karim's comments should i accept, yours or
> Karim's? I'm really torn on that issue. (_that_ was sarcastic)

Hmm ... this might explain why we're having a hard time here ... me
thinks: Ingo don't see that dynamic tracing is orthogonal to static
markup and Ingo don't see that my explanation is orthogonal to
Roman's (i.e. I did factually explain stuff and did resort to
sarcasm as part of said explanation) ... maybe Ingo does not like
orthogonal stuff ...

That _too_ was sarcastic.

Karim

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-16 00:07    [W:0.290 / U:0.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site