lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

    Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > hm, so you dont consider the above paragraph a whine. How would you
    > characterize it then? A measured, balanced, on-topic technical comment?
    > I'm truly curious.

    Take it for what you want. It's yours to disparage. Consider, though,
    that I'm factually explaining the real-life result of resistance to
    static instrumentation. It's not entirely detached, I'll admit, but
    consider that it remained on-topic and entirely respectful of all parties
    involved. I've enjoyed very positive relationships with all those
    individuals and continue to hold them with high regard. They took the
    decisions they thought were best at the time, and I can only respect
    them for having acted as responsibly as they found relevant for their
    respective organizations. I don't agree with it, but that's life. It
    was just important to me to point out to the casual reader the source
    of a lot of the fud than can be found on ltt -- i.e. lots of it is
    marketing. For sure ltt initially got a lot of things wrong, but the
    progress of kernel tracing overall would have been much better had
    the naysayers actually chose to understand the problem instead of
    stonewalling the efforts being invested.

    Karim

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-15 23:11    [W:4.902 / U:0.560 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site