[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:38:58 +0100
    Alan Cox <> wrote:

    > gcc -g produces extensive annotations which are then usably by many
    > tools other than gdb.

    This is something I'm curious about. AFAICT there are two(*) reasons for
    wanting static tracepoints:

    a) to be able to get at local variables and

    b) as a "marker" somewhere within the body of a function - the
    expectation here is that identifiying that particular spot in the
    function would be hard without some marker which moves around as the
    functions itself is modified over time.

    If a) is true, then isn't this simply a feature request against the
    systemtap infrastructure? There's no reason per-se why a kprobe point
    cannot access locals, using the dwarf debug info. It'll be somewhat
    unreliable, because stack slots and registers go out of scope and get
    reused for other things. But as any gdb user will know, it's still

    As for b), if it was _really_ an advantage to be able to identify
    particular places within the body of a function then one could concoct a
    macro which inserts some info into a separate elf section and which adds no
    code at all to actual .text.

    Although IMO this is a bit lame - it is quite possible to go into
    SexySystemTapGUI, click on a particular kernel file-n-line and have
    systemtap userspace keep track of that place in the kernel source across
    many kernel versions: all it needs to do is to remember the file+line and a
    snippet of the surrounding text, for readjustment purposes.

    (*) I don't buy the performance arguments: kprobes are quick, and I'd
    expect that the CPU consumption of the destination of the probe is
    comparable to or higher than the cost of taking the initial trap.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-15 19:49    [W:0.028 / U:0.088 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site