Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:23:39 -0400 | From | Karim Yaghmour <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 |
| |
Alan Cox wrote: > b has been done, its called kprobes. We just need better tools for the > dynamic probes.
As long as there needs to be the updating of an outside piece of something then "b" hasn't been done. Especially with regards to what this means to figuring out which of kernel or instrumentation-script is broken when you get bug reports on lkml.
> and you can maintain "Karim's probe list" which is the dynamic probe set > which matches your old static probes, only of course its now much more > flexible.
Sorry, the issue isn't about my probe list. The issue is that there needs to be a way of pointing important events without having to modify things at 3 or 4 different places. The only way this can be done is if it's in the tree -- regardless of the mechanism. This isn't about static tracers vs. dynamic tracers, it's about statically marking code. What goes underneath is secondary. And if the static markup -- with even the SystemTap people are interested in -- is but a hook for further selecting the appropriate instrumentation mechanism, then that's fine too.
Karim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |