[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/19] Hardware Accelerated MD RAID5: Introduction
    On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:17:55PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
    > >Out of curiosity; how does accelerated compare to non-accelerated?
    > One quick example:
    > 4-disk SATA array rebuild on iop321 without acceleration - 'top'
    > reports md0_resync and md0_raid5 dueling for the CPU each at ~50%
    > utilization.
    > With acceleration - 'top' reports md0_resync cpu utilization at ~90%
    > with the rest split between md0_raid5 and md0_raid5_ops.
    > The sync speed reported by /proc/mdstat is ~40% higher in the accelerated
    > case.

    Ok, nice :)

    > That being said, array resync is a special case, so your mileage may
    > vary with other applications.

    Every-day usage I/O performance data would be nice indeed :)

    > I will put together some data from bonnie++, iozone, maybe contest,
    > and post it on SourceForge.



    / jakob

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-14 09:45    [W:0.022 / U:3.308 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site