Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 | From | (Frank Ch. Eigler) | Date | 14 Sep 2006 15:48:17 -0400 |
| |
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> writes:
> [...] What would be really nice is one trace infrastructure, that > allowed both static and dynamic tracepoints
We in systemtap land hope to encounter *some* static tracepoint structure, perhaps like the one I presented at OLS, via which systemtap could become your unified static+dynamic "infrastructure". Even in that universe, using LTT-derived code for high-performance tracing is within the realm of reason.
> without all the awk-style language crap that seems to come with > systemtap.
I'm sorry to hear you dislike the scripting language. But that's okay, you Real Men can embed literal C code inside systemtap scripts to do the Real Work, and leave to systemtap only sundry duties such as probe placement and removal.
- FChE - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |