![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Yes, this is much, much better. Could you please tell me if depth should > be a true depth or just an unique number? The reason I am asking is that > I hope to get rid of parent/child pointers in serio (they were > introduced when driver core could not handle recursive addition/removing > of devices on the same bus). I am afraid you can't generate just any unique number to represent the lock class, as the lockdep validator fails if the class number is higher than MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES, which is by default 8. Regarding the patches - should I submit them upstream, or will you? Thanks, -- JiKos. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-09-14 17:11 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||