[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] slab: Do not use mempolicy for kmalloc_node
    On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:48:58PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
    > On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
    > The two cases were your patch still applied memory policies were:
    > 1. nodeid = -1. This is one particular case that we wanted to fix because
    > it means use numa_node_id().

    OK, I did not realise nodeid = -1 _should_ imply current node. Not using
    mempolicy makes sense then.

    > 2. The case where the nodelist does not yet exist.
    > AFAIK this situation only occurs on boot strap when we are actually
    > attempting to allocate from a different node than what we are running on.
    > Falling back to the local node is the right thing to do because we have
    > that already working. A process that is running on a node must always have
    > the nodelists for all caches allocated. The cpuup callbacks take care of that.
    > kmalloc_node needs work like page_alloc_node. page_alloc_node() never
    > consults memory policies and thus one would not expect kmalloc_node to do
    > so either.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-14 01:59    [W:0.022 / U:8.380 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site