![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 05:39:22PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 05:21:12PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > So why isn't acpi handling all of this for us? > > for some people it does... > > > Do people not want to use acpi for some reason? > > I was told that in the past VIA has buggy/broken ACPI, so we need to > figure out what ACPI workaround Windows has and implement that (or > maybe they do it in the driver(s)?) Then that sounds like an ACPI issue, instead of trying to create a quirk for the pci device itself. Why not enable ACPI (which the manufacturer says is the way to go), and then work from there? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-09-10 04:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||