Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC]: New termios take 2 | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:24:41 +0100 |
| |
Ar Sul, 2006-09-10 am 12:20 +0100, ysgrifennodd David Woodhouse: > But I don't think it's realistic to suggest that C libraries should be > built without access to our asm/term{bit,io}s.h at all. However, I'm > only really responsible for the new export _mechanism_ -- I'm not going > to impose policy except when people like Andi do stupid things and > sneakily send private patches to undo fixes I've already made.
glibc needs them, nobody else does.
The point I was trying to make is that user space (except glibc) does not use them. glibc presents a different struct termios to them already, and it always includes c_ispeed/c_ospeed.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |