![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi! > I wanted to note what Martin Mares just raised in the > thread "State of the Linux PCI Subsystem for 2.6.18-rc6": > > >Changing the device order in the middle of the 2.6 > >cycle doesn't sound > >like a sane idea to me. Many people have changed their > >systems' configuration > >to adapt to the 2.6 ordering and this patch would break > >their setups. > >I have seen many such examples in my vicinity. > > > >I believe that not breaking existing 2.6 setups is much > >more important > >than keeping compatibility with 2.4 kernels, especially > >when the problem > >is discovered after more than 2 years after release of > >the first 2.6. > > > I'm not siding with either Martin or Matt explicitly, > just noting that there are good arguments for both sides. I agree with martin here. 'Lets break all the machines where people are currently using 2.6.x, for benefit of people currently running 2.4.x' is *very* bad idea. Pavel -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-09-10 09:37 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||