![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Do you meant utimes(file, NULL)? But is it correct behaviour? Why then do you get -EPERM on utimes(file, smth) if the file is append-only? And why do you get -EACCESS on utimes(file, NULL), if this file is immutable? Could you explain, why is it done so? On Wednesday 09 August 2006 00:38, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 03:44:07PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > > [PATCH] move IMMUTABLE|APPEND checks to notify_change() > >> > This patch moves lots of IMMUTABLE and APPEND flag checks > > scattered all around to more logical place in notify_change().>> NAK. For example, you are allowed to do unames(file, NULL) on > any file you own or can write to, whether it's append-only or > not. With your change that gets -EPERM. -- Thanks, Dmitry. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-09 09:17 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||