lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: modifying degraded raid 1 then re-adding other members is bad
On Wednesday August 9, jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de wrote:
> >> Why we're updating it BACKWARD in the first place?
> >
> >To avoid writing to spares when it isn't needed - some people want
> >their spare drives to go to sleep.
>
> That sounds a little dangerous. What if it decrements below 0?

It cannot.
md decrements the event count only on a dirty->clean transition, and
only if it had previously incremented the count on a clean->dirty
transition. So it can never go below what it was when the array was
assembled.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-10 01:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans