![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>> > Tag subject lines from non subscribes with [nonsub] and everyone can >> > then decide for themselves. >> >> This looks like a very clever yet simple idea (if easy to implement at all) ! >> While I have no anti-spam and am not annoyed at all by the low spam rate on >> LKML, I think this would make my cleaning operations even more effective. +1 >That would mean 8 fewer characters of useful information visible in the >subject line. For those who use a graphical client this should not be a problem, pixels are plenty. For 80x25 readers, well, I can only suggest to use an index listing optimized to your needs. For example, the default pine listing left too few space for the subject for me on LKML, so I changed it to be like (index-format=MSGNO STATUS SUBJECT FROM SMARTTIME SIZENARROW) 314 D | | |-Re: Time to forbid non-subscri Andi Kleen Tue02pm (3K) 315 . | |-Re: Time to forbid non-subscribe Alan Cox Tue03pm (3K) 316 . | |-Re: Time to forbid non-subscri Willy Tarreau Tue09pm (3K) 317 . | |-Re: Time to forbid non-subsc Lee Revell Tue04pm (3K) 318 | |-Re: Time to forbid non-sub Kyle Moffett Tue05pm (3K) 319 N |-Re: Time to forbid non-subscribers David Miller Tue03pm (2K) Since a lot of mails are already prefixed with something [], like [PATCH], I do not really mind if there's [nonsub], or if you like to keep it short, you can make that [NSUB], and it even outperforms [PATCH] wrt. length. Then it would only take the key sequence ;ts[NSUB]<Enter>adx to kill all the nonsub messages. However, I would also be fine with an extra header in the mail header saying "this comes from a non-subscriber", the key seq in pine would be slightly bigger though, ";thMajordomo-Info<Enter>nonsub<Enter>adx". Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-09 08:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||