[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] NUMA futex hashing
Ulrich Drepper wrote:

>> Of course we would need a new syscall, and to change glibc to be able to
>> actually use this new private_futex syscall.
> No, why? The kernel already does recognize private mutexes. It just
> checks whether the pages used to store it are private or mapped. This
> requires some interaction with the memory subsystem but as long as no
> crashes happen the data can change underneath. It's the program's
> fault if it does.

Because that requires taking mmap_sem. Avoiding that is the whole
purpose, isn't it?


Send instant messages to your online friends

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-09 04:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean