![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> writes: >> > >> > However not that particular patch - i already changed that >> > code in my tree because I needed really early per cpu for something and >> > i had switched to using a static array for cpu0's cpudata. >> > >> > I will modify it to work like your proposal. >> >> Sounds good to me. > > Actually i ended up going with your patch and dropping mine > because of some other issues and I solved the problem > that caused me to do the other in a different way. Ok. Since this is the agreed upon path, Andrew can you please pick this patch up for the next -mm release? Then the final practical question does it still make sense to decouple the NR_IRQS from NR_CPUS? As my other patch was doing? Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-08 09:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||