![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:51:38PM +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote: > There's a note right above the function that explains it: > * NOTE! This depends on the fact that even if we _do_ > * get an old value of "parent", we can happily dereference > * the pointer (it was and remains a dereferencable kernel pointer > * no matter what): we just can't necessarily trust the result > * until we know that the parent pointer is valid. Even without getting into just how ugly this is, is it really worth it? Cheers, Muli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-08 16:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||