lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    >>>Doesnt the ability to move tasks between groups dynamically affect
    >>>(atleast) memory controller design (in giving up ownership etc)?
    >>
    >>we save object owner on the object. So if you change the container,
    >>objects are still correctly charged to the creator and are uncharged
    >>correctly on free.
    >>
    >
    >
    > Seems like the object owner should also change when the object moves
    > from one container to another.
    Consider a file which is opened in 2 processes. one of the processes
    wants to move to another container then. How would you decide whether
    to change the file owner or not?

    Kirill

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-07 09:21    [W:3.309 / U:0.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site