![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>>>Doesnt the ability to move tasks between groups dynamically affect >>>(atleast) memory controller design (in giving up ownership etc)? >> >>we save object owner on the object. So if you change the container, >>objects are still correctly charged to the creator and are uncharged >>correctly on free. >> > > > Seems like the object owner should also change when the object moves > from one container to another. Consider a file which is opened in 2 processes. one of the processes wants to move to another container then. How would you decide whether to change the file owner or not? Kirill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-07 09:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||