Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:19:40 +0400 | From | Kirill Korotaev <> | Subject | Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller |
| |
>>>Doesnt the ability to move tasks between groups dynamically affect >>>(atleast) memory controller design (in giving up ownership etc)? >> >>we save object owner on the object. So if you change the container, >>objects are still correctly charged to the creator and are uncharged >>correctly on free. >> > > > Seems like the object owner should also change when the object moves > from one container to another. Consider a file which is opened in 2 processes. one of the processes wants to move to another container then. How would you decide whether to change the file owner or not?
Kirill
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |