[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] x86 paravirt_ops: binary patching infrastructure
    On Monday 07 August 2006 06:48, Rusty Russell wrote:

    > +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
    > +void apply_paravirt(struct paravirt_patch *start, struct paravirt_patch *end)

    It would be better to merge this with the existing LOCK prefix patching
    or perhaps the normal alternative() patcher (is there any particular
    reason you can't use it?)

    Three alternative patching mechanisms just seems to be too many

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-07 07:43    [W:0.018 / U:45.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site