Messages in this thread | | | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86 paravirt_ops: implementation of paravirt_ops | Date | Mon, 7 Aug 2006 07:39:33 +0200 |
| |
On Monday 07 August 2006 06:47, Rusty Russell wrote: > This patch does the dumbest possible replacement of paravirtualized > instructions: calls through a "paravirt_ops" structure. Currently > these are function implementations of native hardware: hypervisors > will override the ops structure with their own variants.
You should call it HAL - that would make it clearer what it is.
I think I would prefer to patch always. Is there a particular reason you can't do that?
-Andi
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |