lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [ProbableSpam] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
From
Date
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 02:30 -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Kirill wrote:
> > > A filesystem based interface is useful when you have hierarchies (as resource
> > > groups and cpusets do) since it naturally defines a convenient to use
> > > hierarchical namespace.
> > but it is not much convinient for applications then.
>
> Is this simply a language issue? File systems hierarchies
> are more easily manipulated with shell utilities (ls, cat,
> find, grep, ...) and system call API's are easier to access
> from C?
>
> If so, then perhaps all that's lacking for convenient C access
> to a filesystem based interface is a good library, that presents
> an API convenient for use from C code, but underneath makes the
> necessary file system calls (open, read, diropen, stat, ...).
>

I totally agree.

When the difference comes to language issue, one advantage of filesystem
is that there is no need for a user space app to do simple management.
--

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- sekharan@us.ibm.com | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-07 18:03    [W:0.152 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site