Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:50:40 +0100 | From | "Jan Beulich" <> | Subject | Re: notify_page_fault_chain |
| |
>> I consider it already questionable to split out a specific >> fault from the general die notification (previous users of the functionality all of the sudden won't get notifications >> for one of the most crucial faults anymore), but entirely hiding the functionality (unavailable without CONFIG_KPROBES, >> and even with it not getting exported) is really odd. > >You want to use it for your debugger?
Yes, in its "light" form (i.e. without exception handling framework changes) it has to rely on this infrastructure.
Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |