[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ACLs
On Saturday 05 August 2006 20:03, RazorBlu wrote:
> > Precisely what? What's defined in POSIX ACLs wouldn't apply well to
> > processes anyway since they were designed for file access. SELinux was
> > created to deal with what you're talking about, why not use it?
> Because SELinux is too complicated to be used effectively by most system
> administrators - that's why.

First you didn't RTFM, and moaned about how superior Windows NT was to Linux,
now you've been given multiple (superior) solutions, you're moaning that
they're too complicated?

Please, complain on SELinux mailing lists, don't pollute LKML any further.


Final year Computer Science undergraduate.
1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-05 22:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans