lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 5 Aug 2006 20:33:07 +1000
SubjectRe: problems with e1000 and jumboframes
FromHerbert Xu <>
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 02:24:36PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> > If we had a flag to indicate writability we could also have a flag to
> > indicate that the memory comes from kmalloc rather than alloc_page.
> 
> Yes, that would be good, but who will give us a bit in the struct page?
> Can we recreate frag_list elements to be a bitmasks and steal couple
> of them there, so we would not increase fragment's structure size?

I wasn't thinking of a bit in struct page, but rather a bit in skb_frag_t.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-05 12:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2008