lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 04 Aug 2006 18:57:01 +0400
FromKirill Korotaev <>
SubjectRe: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
>>The downside to such a strategy is that there is a risk that nobody ever
>>gets around to implementing useful controllers, so it ends up dead code. 
>>I'd judge that the interest in resource management is such that the risk of
>>this happening is low.
> 
> 
> I think the risk is that OpenVZ has all the controls and resource
> managers we need, while CKRM is still more research-ish. I find the
> OpenVZ code much clearer, cleaner and complete at the moment, although
> also much more conservative in its approach to solving problems.

Alan, I will be happy to hear what you mean by conservative :)
Maybe we can make it more revolutinary then.

Kirill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-04 16:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2008