![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>>The downside to such a strategy is that there is a risk that nobody ever >>gets around to implementing useful controllers, so it ends up dead code. >>I'd judge that the interest in resource management is such that the risk of >>this happening is low. > > > I think the risk is that OpenVZ has all the controls and resource > managers we need, while CKRM is still more research-ish. I find the > OpenVZ code much clearer, cleaner and complete at the moment, although > also much more conservative in its approach to solving problems. Alan, I will be happy to hear what you mean by conservative :) Maybe we can make it more revolutinary then. Kirill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-04 16:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||