![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Ar Iau, 2006-08-03 am 22:42 -0700, ysgrifennodd Andrew Morton: > The downside to such a strategy is that there is a risk that nobody ever > gets around to implementing useful controllers, so it ends up dead code. > I'd judge that the interest in resource management is such that the risk of > this happening is low. I think the risk is that OpenVZ has all the controls and resource managers we need, while CKRM is still more research-ish. I find the OpenVZ code much clearer, cleaner and complete at the moment, although also much more conservative in its approach to solving problems. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-08-04 11:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||