[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    Ar Iau, 2006-08-03 am 22:42 -0700, ysgrifennodd Andrew Morton:
    > The downside to such a strategy is that there is a risk that nobody ever
    > gets around to implementing useful controllers, so it ends up dead code.
    > I'd judge that the interest in resource management is such that the risk of
    > this happening is low.

    I think the risk is that OpenVZ has all the controls and resource
    managers we need, while CKRM is still more research-ish. I find the
    OpenVZ code much clearer, cleaner and complete at the moment, although
    also much more conservative in its approach to solving problems.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-04 11:33    [W:0.020 / U:107.772 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site