lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    Date
    Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

    > Trond merged the large nfs-affecting ones; I don't know if he intends to
    > handle the non-nfs bulk of the work though.

    There is one large NFS affecting patch left: namely the one that makes NFS use
    FS-Cache. I presume that requires Trond's agreement to merge.

    > Your CONFIG_BLOCK patches did a decent job of trashing your
    > fs-cache-make-kafs-* patches, btw. What's up with that? OK, it's sensible
    > for people to work against mainline but the net effect of doing that is to
    > create a mess for other people to clean up.

    Hmmm... Jens wanted my block patches against his tree; you wanted my NFS
    patches against Trond's NFS tree. I guess I should try stacking the whole
    lot, but against what? And who carries the fixes? A patch to fix this
    problem may well only apply to a tree that's the conjunction of both:-/

    > If Christoph acks them then I can send them to Trond or Linus, at Trond's
    > option.
    >
    > Or I can butt out, drop the patches, wait for them to turn up in Trond's
    > tree, at your option.

    Trond, Christoph? Any thoughts?


    David
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-31 19:45    [W:2.547 / U:0.984 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site